SIGIA-L Mail Archives: Re: [Sigia-l] validating an IA?
Re: [Sigia-l] validating an IA?
On 27/3/06 3:47 PM, "Leisa Reichelt" <leisa.reichelt_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> all the consultants who have 'validated' me, have done so via
> interviews... I articulate my strategy to them, show them sitemaps,
> wireframes, process flows, justify with all my research etc.
> they ask many questions, I answer many questions. We make some
> adjustments (sometimes), and at the end they 'see that it is good',
> and report accordingly.
This is different from the "validation" I've been asked to do. In one case
they are asking for a proposed IA (site hierarchy and wireframes) to be
tested against their users, and in the other case they want their existing
IA (designed some years ago), to be re-evaluated against the existing
When replying, please *trim your post* as much as possible.
*Plain text, please; NO Attachments
Searchable Archive at http://www.info-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/
IA 06 Summit. Mark your calendar. March 23-27, Vancouver, BC. http://www.iasummit.org/
Sigia-l mailing list -- post to: Sigia-l_at_asis.org
Changes to subscription: http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6
: Mon Mar 27 2006 - 10:32:28 EST