RE: [Sigia-l] Search Engines: 99% Bad

From: Trenouth, John (John.Trenouth_at_cardinal.com)
Date: Tue Jan 10 2006 - 15:43:31 EST

• Next message: andrew_at_friendlymanual.com: "Re: [Sigia-l] Search Engines: 99% Bad"
• Previous message: Fred Beecher: "Re: [Sigia-l] Search Engines: 99% Bad"
• Maybe in reply to: Listera: "[Sigia-l] Search Engines: 99% Bad"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> You knew it was coming:
>
> <http://www.useit.com/alertbox/search_engines.html>
>
> My book to the first person to spot the first 5 fallacies therein. :-)

I especially like it when Nielsen says:

"The real goal is to make users come back, and to have them come
directly to your site instead of clicking on expensive ads"

About a decade of web-guru-ness and that is his great e-commerce
epiphany. Where would we be without you, sir?

------------
When replying, please *trim your post* as much as possible.
*Plain text, please; NO Attachments

Searchable Archive at http://www.info-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/

IA 06 Summit. Mark your calendar. March 23-27, Vancouver, BC

________________________________________
Sigia-l mailing list -- post to: Sigia-l_at_asis.org
Changes to subscription: http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l

• Next message: andrew_at_friendlymanual.com: "Re: [Sigia-l] Search Engines: 99% Bad"
• Previous message: Fred Beecher: "Re: [Sigia-l] Search Engines: 99% Bad"
• Maybe in reply to: Listera: "[Sigia-l] Search Engines: 99% Bad"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Tue Jan 10 2006 - 18:14:44 EST