SIGIA-L Mail Archives: RE: [Sigia-l] eye tracking?
RE: [Sigia-l] eye tracking?
At 09:07 PM 1/9/2006, Christopher Fahey wrote:
>I'm perfectly happy and eager to hear rebuttals to this skepticism, as I
>have zero actual experience with the technology and techniques.
Actually, Chris, I have a *ton* of experience with it and I think you're
As one of the early folks (maybe even the first) who looked at web usage
with an eye tracker, we found it a fun toy that could really occupy a lot
of our time, both in data collection and analysis. Though software has
improved slightly since we first started looking at it, it hasn't solved
the big issues.
People think that an eye tracker measures what a user sees. In fact, it
only measures what their eyes gaze at. There's a significant difference.
The more we played with it, the more we realized that, because a user gazes
at a design element doesn't mean they see it. We saw many instances where
the user gazed straight at something for many seconds but not recall ever
One of the more interesting unexplained phenomenon was that we noticed that
many users could land the mouse pointer in the scroll bar and successfully
scroll *without ever gazing at the scroll controls*. Our inference was that
they were attaining the scroll controls with their mouse using their
peripheral vision. If this is true, that means that users actually can see
things *they don't gaze at."
So, if users don't see things they do gaze at and don't gaze at things they
see, what does an eye tracker actually tell you? This is why you haven't
seen any research from us recently on this topic.
The eye tracker lets you *observe* where the gaze of the user's eye goes
relative to the screen. However, it does not help with inferences. (See
http://tinyurl.com/9kxou for why this distinction is important.)
One of my favorite examples of poor inferences from eye tracker data is
found in the Eye tools blog. (Eye tools makes software and sells a service
based on that software, so they are very pro-eye tracker.)
In http://tinyurl.com/7vabo , they claim that they "improved" the SFPD web
site by using eye tracker data to guide their decision. Look real close at
the before and after. Their inference was that people weren't looking at
the navigation, so what did they do to the site? They put a mongo-big
useless image in the portion of the page users *were* looking at, to force
them to look at the now only useful part of the page. From their site:
>The moral of the story: A change on one part of the page can impact other,
>unrelated elements on the page. The right navigation bar was used
>completely differently on the new re-designed website because the content
>to the left of it changed.
>Is this good or bad? Ultimately, that's up to the client to decide as it
>relates to the business goals of the page. However, in this case, it was
>good it enabled visitors to quickly locate the specific content they wanted.
Huh. They didn't measure if visitors actually locate the content they want
more quickly. The only measured if people's brief eye gazes went to what
they believed were the proper portion of the screen. That's quite a jump...
Eye tracking can be useful for some types of measurements, but as Chris and
Stewart have mentioned, it's not particularly a useful tool for day-to-day
Jared M. Spool, Founding Principal, User Interface Engineering
4 Lookout Lane, Unit 4d, Middleton, MA 01949
978 777-9123 jspool_at_uie.com http://www.uie.com
When replying, please *trim your post* as much as possible.
*Plain text, please; NO Attachments
Searchable Archive at http://www.info-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/
IA 06 Summit. Mark your calendar. March 23-27, Vancouver, BC
Sigia-l mailing list -- post to: Sigia-l_at_asis.org
Changes to subscription: http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6
: Tue Jan 10 2006 - 04:05:05 EST