| Return to http://www.info-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/0601/0013.html |
Re: [Sigia-l] Re: Putting the "Graphic" back with "Designer" (was:the lesser importance of home pages)
From: Listera (listera_at_rcn.com)
Peter Boersma:
> Where they begin can be determined;
Really?
That's "design by committee." Neatly designated compartment do *not* create
> So you do acknowledge that roles/titles naturally map to facets of problem
No, I don't. In case it wasn't clear, the above refers to the *dissolution*
You did: "That's why I like working in a team setting, with team members who
> What if I choose to call myself an Information Architect instead of a Designer
Nothing. You'd still be focusing on titles/labels/deliverables/compartments
> If it is true that AIGA now cares for design strategists, who will care for
Third party opportunity? :-)
> If AIGA wants to start competing with, say, DMI (Design Management Institute)
If you want to play that game: the plebian graphic-designer hordes in the
---- Ziya "Innovate as a last resort." ------------ When replying, please *trim your post* as much as possible. *Plain text, please; NO Attachments Searchable Archive at http://www.info-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/ IA 06 Summit. Mark your calendar. March 23-27, Vancouver, BC ________________________________________ Sigia-l mailing list -- post to: Sigia-l_at_asis.org Changes to subscription: http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Mon Jan 02 2006 - 20:47:36 EST
|
| Return to http://www.info-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/0601/0013.html |