Re: [Sigia-l] To Title or Not to Title (Was: Becoming and IA)

From: Listera (listera_at_rcn.com)
Date: Tue Jun 28 2005 - 02:31:53 EDT

• Next message: Jursa, Jan (init): "[Sigia-l] data as information?"
• Previous message: Eric Scheid: "Re: [Sigia-l] To Title or Not to Title (Was: Becoming and IA)"
• In reply to: Eric Scheid: "Re: [Sigia-l] To Title or Not to Title (Was: Becoming and IA)"
• Next in thread: Eric Scheid: "Re: [Sigia-l] To Title or Not to Title (Was: Becoming and IA)"
• Reply: Eric Scheid: "Re: [Sigia-l] To Title or Not to Title (Was: Becoming and IA)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Eric Scheid:

> Is "Information Architect" not well defined? Yes. Is this a problem? No!

I agree. Something I've been saying for years here. Stop obsessing with
titles/definitions/labels/etc. Define the context. Get yourself understood.
Get on with life. I'm glad you've finally seen the light.:-)

Ziya
Nullius in Verba

------------
When replying, please *trim your post* as much as possible.
*Plain text, please; NO Attachments

Searchable Archive at http://www.info-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/

IA 06 Summit. Mark your calendar. March 23-27, Vancouver, BC

________________________________________
Sigia-l mailing list -- post to: Sigia-l_at_asis.org
Changes to subscription: http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l

• Next message: Jursa, Jan (init): "[Sigia-l] data as information?"
• Previous message: Eric Scheid: "Re: [Sigia-l] To Title or Not to Title (Was: Becoming and IA)"
• In reply to: Eric Scheid: "Re: [Sigia-l] To Title or Not to Title (Was: Becoming and IA)"
• Next in thread: Eric Scheid: "Re: [Sigia-l] To Title or Not to Title (Was: Becoming and IA)"
• Reply: Eric Scheid: "Re: [Sigia-l] To Title or Not to Title (Was: Becoming and IA)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Tue Jun 28 2005 - 03:47:20 EDT