SIGIA-L Mail Archives: Re: [Sigia-l] IA research?
Re: [Sigia-l] IA research?
"Peter VanDijck" wrote:
> It's not so much about "couldn't solve". It's about better ways of
> understanding the problems, and better ways of attacking them.
OK, I'll rephrase: what problem(s) have you not been able to better
understand and attack?
> if IA doesn't become more research-driven (I mean *basic* research, not the
> practical user research you do when doing a project), it risks becoming
> obsolete.
Leaving aside the contentious issue of whether IA is a profession or not,
your implicit assumption is on shaky grounds. Professions that are not
driven by researchism (like writing, design and photography) are thriving
while those that are driven by it (like artificial intelligence, speech and
visualization) seem to have gone nowhere. I'm not drawing a 1:1 conclusion
here, but simply pointing out the fallacy of researchism as a necessary
predictor.
> A few rules of thumb and borrowed concepts don't make a profession.
Neither, apparently, reams of paper. :-)
Ziya
Nullius in Verba
------------
When replying, please *trim your post* as much as possible.
*Plain text, please; NO Attachments
Searchable list archive: http://www.info-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/
________________________________________
Sigia-l mailing list -- post to: Sigia-l_at_asis.org
Changes to subscription: http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6
: Mon Apr 26 2004 - 17:07:54 EDT
|
