SIGIA-L Mail Archives: RE: [Sigia-l] History of "Informati
RE: [Sigia-l] History of "Information Architecture"
From: Groot, Boyd de (boyd.de.groot_at_satama.com)
Date: Wed Oct 15 2003 - 06:48:59 EDT
Ok, since these are clearly rhetorical questions set up towards a nice
climax, is there also a point somewhere here or is it just about form? :-)
--Boyd
-----Original Message-----
From: Listera [mailto:listera_at_rcn.com]
Sent: woensdag 15 oktober 2003 13:10
To: Sigia-l
Subject: Re: [Sigia-l] History of "Information Architecture"
"Beth Mazur" wrote:
> Curious that this same discussion is now going on with the interaction
> community (some, like Tog, who think that interaction architect is
preferable
> to interaction designer).
Pop quiz: What percentage of non-geeks can tell the difference between an
interaction architect and an interaction designer?
Bonus points: What percentage of the above would even know what either of
them does?
Grand prize: What percentage of the above would care either way?
For the ultimate vacation package: Is "public" (as quoted from Wurman) our
primary audience/client/customer/center of focus, when worrying about
terminology?
----
Ziya
Design is the art of gradually applying constraints
until only one solution remains.
------------
When replying, please *trim your post* as much as possible.
*Plain text, please; NO Attachments
Searchable list archive: http://www.info-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/
________________________________________
Sigia-l mailing list -- post to: Sigia-l_at_asis.org
Changes to subscription: http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l
------------
When replying, please *trim your post* as much as possible.
*Plain text, please; NO Attachments
Searchable list archive: http://www.info-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/
________________________________________
Sigia-l mailing list -- post to: Sigia-l_at_asis.org
Changes to subscription: http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2
: Sun Nov 23 2003 - 22:55:57 EST
|
