Re: [Sigia-l] Re: Flash no longer 99% bad

• Next message: tstephens_at_trusecure.com: "RE: [Sigia-l] books brand: separate site or sub-section?"
• Previous message: Christine Fitts: "[Sigia-l] books brand: separate site or sub-section?"
• Maybe in reply to: Anders Ramsay: "[Sigia-l] Re: Flash no longer 99% bad"
• Next in thread: Ziya Oz: "Re: [Sigia-l] Re: Flash no longer 99% bad"
• Reply: Ziya Oz: "Re: [Sigia-l] Re: Flash no longer 99% bad"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Donald A. Norman wrote:

>Remember, the quarrel has always been with the website designer, not with
>the tool.

... but the article was titled "Flash: 99% Bad" ...
Did they actually mean "Flash Users: 99% Incompetent"?

- Phil Arko

_________________________________________________________________
Testen Sie MSN Messenger für Ihren Online-Chat mit Freunden:
http://messenger.msn.com

------------
When replying, please *trim your post* as much as possible.

*Plain text, please; NO Attachments

ASIST SIG IA website: http://www.asis.org/SIG/SIGIA/index.html
_______________________________________________
Sigia-l mailing list -- post to: Sigia-l_at_asis.org
Changes to subscription: http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l

• Next message: tstephens_at_trusecure.com: "RE: [Sigia-l] books brand: separate site or sub-section?"
• Previous message: Christine Fitts: "[Sigia-l] books brand: separate site or sub-section?"
• Maybe in reply to: Anders Ramsay: "[Sigia-l] Re: Flash no longer 99% bad"
• Next in thread: Ziya Oz: "Re: [Sigia-l] Re: Flash no longer 99% bad"
• Reply: Ziya Oz: "Re: [Sigia-l] Re: Flash no longer 99% bad"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Nov 23 2003 - 22:55:18 EST