Return to http://www.info-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/0103/0096.html


SIGIA-L Mail Archives: SIGIA-L: cost justifying usability: summ

SIGIA-L: cost justifying usability: summary

From: Jane Austin (jane_at_deepend.co.uk)
Date: Wed Mar 07 2001 - 13:55:28 EST


The consensus appeared to be - it depends on the site. A familiar story...

Here's the summary of answers I received. If this inspires anyone to send me any more info, please
do so. I'll summarise and post any more replies I get.

Summary:

I recommend you have a look at Creative Good's white papers. They're
well written, generally convincing, and there's a fair amount of statistics.

http://www.creativegood.com/
especially
http://www.creativegood.com/holiday2000/
and
http://www.creativegood.com/survival/

The emphasis tends to be on retail sites.

Mark Hurst, the founder, often posts on CHI-WEB.

francois Jordaan
Wheel
85 Clerkenwell Road, London EC1R 5AR
T +44 (0)20 7071 8000 F +44 (0)20 7831 0181
Direct +44 (0)20 7071 8459
francois.jordaan_at_wheel.co.uk www.wheel.co.uk

Jane

Mark Hurst at http://www.creativegood.com/ has some very impressive
claims on the efficacy of his applied user experience methods.
"Our projects typically raise conversion rates between 40% and
150%. Here is a client list and a description of our consulting services."

He also says this here (http://www.g21.net/mem22.html):
"To give you just one example, we have a client who went from
40% to 140% conversion rate among their customers ---
that means $65 million in increased sales based on simplifying
the customer experience."

You might call them for more concrete details suitable for
presentation. Looks like "Cost Justifying Usability" is something to
have handy as well.

best,

Joseph Tucker
user_experience_at_mindspring.com
http://www.mindspring.com/~user_experience (beta)

Jane,

I honestly don't think stats from other redesigns
would be meaningful. They might help sell a client,
but I'd be very careful about making that kind of
analogy. If you send a case study that says "usability
redesign brings in 150% more visitors" and your
re-design doesn't deliver that, you could be asking
for trouble.

Another approach would be to examine the current site
logs and set some goals based on the evidence from the
existing site. For example, if 33% of visitors bail
after the first page view, a re-design based on solid
usability might improve that number. You still have
the problem of not wanting to make guarantees, but at
least you are grounding your clients expectations in
current reality.

And frankly, any redesign that doesn't take some
version of this approach -- i.e. doesn't use current
site data -- is missing out on a good opportunity.

--
Chris Chandler
Information Architect at large.
 <cchandle267_at_yahoo.com>

I'm about to launch a redesigned site for my business and plan to do some compartive work between the old and new version based on user feedback and the log analysis. Tell your friend I could share my thought eventually if he's interested.

regards,

Livia Labate

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BizSolutions - Bringing your business online! Brazil: +55 11 50831623 | Australia: +61 2 4970 5521 livia_at_bizsolutions.com.au | http://www.bizsolutions.com.au - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Jane,

This is somewhat indirect evidence, but we did a couple of usage modeling studies a few years ago which demonstrated a strong correlation between site usability and visit frequency (c0ntrolling other factors). (Provided site re-designs enhance site usability one would assume that visit frequency would increase based on these two studies all other variables being equal).

The abstract for the study is at:

http://www.beta-research.com/150998abstract.html

You could try the creativegood.com site and inverseratio.com (I think). Both have some superbly informed 'whitepapers' with documentation of the effects of their own work. You could quote these as abstract 'acheiveable figures'. Also the paper 'Usability is good Business' will give good amunition too. It is not a new paper but is well constructed and argued. There is a link to it from one of the sites.

Good luck ... and if you find anymore, do share with the rest of us!

Samantha Hobbs Head of User Centred Design Razorfish, London

Here is one from my files, from Nate Bolt [nate.bolt_at_CLEARINK.COM] on CHI-WEB

"Good Web Site Design Can Lead to Healthy Sales. It is important to understand what your users are trying to accomplish when they visit your site. If you don't know that, you can't help them achieve their goals. The result: In the first week after the [IBM Site] redesign, use of the "help" button decreased 84 percent, while sales increased 400 percent."

Elisabeth Paine <epaine_at_ImageWks.com =========================================================================== List archives are available at: http://www.listquest.com/computers/tier2/computer_misc.html -------------------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo_at_asis.org with the appropriate command from the list below in the body of the message: subscribe sigia-l subscribe sigia-l-digest unsubscribe sigia-l unsubscribe sigia-l-digest



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Nov 23 2003 - 22:54:34 EST

 

Return to http://www.info-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/0103/0096.html